Organisation von Wissen. Zwischen Offenheit und Exklusivität

Dauerhafte URI für die Sammlung

https://www.weizenbaum-library.de/handle/id/308
Dieser Forschungsschwerpunkt beschäftigt sich mit Fragen zur Arbeitswelt, dem Bildungssystem und der Wissenschaft. Vor allem: Wie offen bzw. exklusiv werden Daten und Wissen hier verarbeitet und organisiert? Dabei wird auf Perspektiven aus der Informatik, Wirtschaftsinformatik, Soziologie und Innovationsforschung zurückgegriffen.

Listen

Auflistung Organisation von Wissen. Zwischen Offenheit und Exklusivität nach Forschungsgruppen "Reorganisation von Wissenspraktiken"

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 11 von 11
  • Vorschaubild
    Item
    A Pragmatic Way to Open Management Research and Education: Playfulness, Ambiguity, and Deterritorialization
    (2022) de Vaujany, François-Xavier; Heimstädt, Maximilian
    The open science movement has reached management research and education. Around the world, management scholars discuss, probe, and evaluate ways to make their work practices less ‘closed’ and more ‘open.’ However, how exactly such new work practices change management knowledge and teaching depends, to a large extent, on practitioners’ philosophical interpretation of ‘openness.’ Today, openness in management research and education is mainly interpreted as a feature of the input to or output from knowledge work. These interpretations conceive of research and education as relatively stable entities which can be opened at some clearly defined points. Our study aims to unsettle this conception and propose a new and more radical interpretation of openness. We propose to reconsider openness via the processual approach of American Pragmatism and thereby in a sense that dispenses with requiring the predisposition of research and education as stable entities. Via this interpretation of openness, management research and education can be transformed into a co-productive democratic movement which can bring about knowledge commons interwoven with true managerial and societal problems. To offer a first description of openness as a process that can transform management research and education, we analyze ethnographic material from two types of pragmatist experiments, which the first author facilitated between 2016 and 2021. We identify three key dimensions in the process of opening research and education: playfulness, ambiguity, and deterritorialization. Our study advances debates on the question of how management research can be more immediately helpful to management practitioners and students’ concerns.
  • Vorschaubild
    Item
    Eine Kartografie des wissenschaftlichen Verlegens
    (transcript Verlag, 2022) Heimstädt, Maximilian; Fischer, Georg; Hofhues, Sandra; Schütze, Konstanze
  • Vorschaubild
    Item
    From Research Evaluation to Research Analytics. The digitization of academic performance measurement
    (2022) Krüger, Anne K.; Petersohn, Sabrina
    One could think that bibliometric measurement of academic performance has always been digital since the computer-assisted invention of the Science Citation Index. Yet, since the 2000s, the digitization of bibliometric infrastructure has accelerated at a rapid pace. Citation databases are indexing an increasing variety of publication types. Altmetric data aggregators are producing data on the reception of research outcomes. Machine-readable persistent identifiers are created to unambiguously identify researchers, research organizations, and research objects; and evaluative software tools and current research information systems are constantly enlarging their functionalities to make use of these data and extract meaning from them. In this article, we analyse how these developments in evaluative bibliometrics have contributed to an extension of indicator-based research evaluation towards data-driven research analytics. Drawing on empirical material from blogs and websites as well as from research and policy papers, we discuss how interoperability, scalability, and flexibility as material specificities of digital infrastructures generate new ways of data production and their assessment, which affect the possibilities of how academic performance can be understood and (e)valuated.
  • Vorschaubild
    Item
    ‘I want to be able to do what I know the tools will allow us to do’: Practicing evaluative bibliometrics through digital infrastructure
    (2023) Krüger, Anne K.; Petersohn, Sabrina
    The proliferation of quantitative research assessment has been accompanied by an increasing growth and diversification of digital infrastructure for evaluative bibliometrics. Since the beginning of the 2000s, insights into academic performance provided by a variety of new databases and devices significantly exceed the capacities of the former Science Citation Index and embedded metrics. Going beyond the research on the construction, uses, and consequences of bibliometric indicators, we therefore posit that a perspective on bibliometric infrastructure is crucial for understanding how evaluative bibliometrics is put into practice. Drawing on interviews with academic librarians on the increasing provision and implementation of bibliometric infrastructure in the years 2013 and 2014, we analyse how the entanglement of technology and its users shapes how evaluative bibliometrics is understood and practiced.
  • Vorschaubild
    Item
    Quantification 2.0? Bibliometric Infrastructures in Academic Evaluation
    (2020) Krüger, Anne K.
    Due to developments recently termed as ‘audit,’ ‘evaluation,’ or ‘metric society,’ universities have become subject to rat- ings and rankings and researchers are evaluated according to standardized quantitative indicators such as their publication output and their personal citation scores. Yet, this development is not only based on the rise of new public management and ideas on ‘the return on public or private investment.’ It has also profited from ongoing technological developments. Due to a massive increase in digital publishing corresponding with the growing availability of related data bibliometric infrastructures for evaluating science are continuously becoming more differentiated and elaborate. They allow for new ways of using bibliometric data through various easily applicable tools. Furthermore, they also produce new quantities of data due to new possibilities in following the digital traces of scientific publications. In this article, I discuss this develop- ment as quantification 2.0. The rise of digital infrastructures for publishing, indexing, and managing scientific publications has not only made bibliometric data become a valuable source for performance assessment. It has triggered an unprece- dented growth in bibliometric data production turning freely accessible data about scientific work into edited databases and producing competition for its users. The production of bibliometric data has thus become decoupled from their appli- cation. Bibliometric data have turned into a self-serving end while their providers are constantly seeking for new tools to make use of them.
  • Vorschaubild
    Item
    Riskante Retweets: „Predictive Risk Intelligence“ und Interessenvertretung in globalen Wertschöpfungsnetzwerken
    (2021) Heimstädt, Maximilian; Dobusch, Leonhard
    Soziale Medien spielen eine paradoxe Rolle für Interessenvertretung in globalen Wertschöpfungsnetzwerken. Zum einen bieten Social-Media-Plattformen Arbeitnehmer*innen und Gewerkschaften die Möglichkeit der Mobilisierung über geografische und institutionelle Distanzen hinweg. Zum anderen lassen diese Plattformen aber auch zu, dass Dritte die digitalen Spuren dieser Kommunikation über Interessenvertretung (z. B. Tweets) extrahieren und verarbeiten. Ziel dieses Beitrages ist es, eine Form dieser Verarbeitung – „Predictive Risk Intelligence“ – als neuen Forschungsgegenstand einzuführen. Anbieter von Predictive Risk Intelligence erstellen, basierend auf Social-Media-Daten, Vorhersagen über Ereignisse wie Streiks und Proteste. Diese Vorhersagen stellen sie anderen Akteuren – beispielsweise Unternehmen – als Dienstleistung zur Verfügung. In diesem Beitrag nähern wir uns dem neuen Forschungsgegenstand über eine Fallstudie zu einem Anbieter dieser Dienstleistung. Ausgehend von der Fallstudie entwickeln wir eine Reihe an Forschungsfragen in Bezug auf etablierte und neue Akteure der Interessenvertretung in Wertschöpfungsnetz- werken. Abschließend diskutieren wir Lösungsansätze für methodische Herausforderungen des neuen Forschungsgegenstandes.
  • Vorschaubild
    Item
    »Schöne neue Lieferkettenwelt«: Workers’ Voice und Arbeitsstandards in Zeiten algorithmischer Vorhersage
    (transcript Verlag, 2023) Klausner, Lukas Daniel; Heimstädt, Maximilian; Dobusch, Leonhard; Haipeter, Thomas; Helfen, Markus; Kirsch, Anja; Rosenbohm, Sophie
  • Vorschaubild
    Item
    Soziologie der Postnormalität
    (2023) Mundt, Ingmar
    Rezension von Stephan Lessenich (2022): Nicht mehr normal: Gesellschaft am Rande des Nervenzusammenbruchs, Berlin: Hanser Berlin. 160 S., ISBN 978-3-446-27383-2, EUR 23,00.
  • Vorschaubild
    Item
    The structural transformation of the scientific public sphere: Constitution and consequences of the path towards open access
    (2023) Dobusch, Leonhard; Heimstädt, Maximilian
    We are currently witnessing a fundamental structural transformation of the scientific public sphere, characterized by processes of specialization, metrification, internationalization, platformization and visibilization. In contrast to explanations of this structural transformation that invoke a technological determinism, we demonstrate its historical contingency by drawing on analytic concepts from organization theory and the case of the Open Access transformation in Germany. The digitization of academic journals has not broadened access to scientific output but narrowed it down even further in the course of the ‘serials crisis’. For a long time, research institutions were not able to convince large academic publishers to adopt less restrictive forms of access to academic journals. It was only through the emergence of new and in part illegal actors (shadow libraries and preprint servers) that the existing path could be broken, and an Open Access path constituted. Following this analysis, we discuss consequences of the Open Access transformation for the public spheres of science and democracy. We conclude that Open Access publishing can only help to transform both communicative spaces towards the normative ideal of a public sphere when complemented by systematic support for non- profit publication infrastructures.
  • Vorschaubild
    Item
    Uncertain futures of work: The perception of generative AI in knowledge professions
    (Nomos, 2025) Butollo, Florian; Haase, Jennifer; Katzinski, Ann-Kathrin; Krüger, Anne K.; Kox, Thomas; Ullrich, André; Zech, Herbert
    The application of generative AI (GenAI) tools has led to widespread speculation about the implications of technological change for the future of cognitive work. This article provides insights on how the use of GenAI affects work practices in the fields of IT programming, science and coaching based on expert interviews and a quantitative survey among users of GenAI. Specifically, we ask about perceptions on skills, creativity, and authenticity, which we regard as key qualities of cognitive work. Contrary to widespread expectations that AI use would hollow out or substitute aspects of cognitive work, we find that there is a strong awareness for the meaning of the professional core in each field. We conclude that the use of AI provokes reflections about the meaning of human work in operating AI tools adequately and taking on responsibility for their results, thereby rather reinforcing its relevance.
  • Vorschaubild
    Item
    Zwischen Wissenschaft, Praxis und Politik: Wie Juristen Gesetzgebungsverfahren in Fachzeitschriften begleiten
    (2022) Metzger, Axel; Schrör, Simon
    Die Rechtswissenschaft setzt sich in Zeiten transparenter Gesetzgebungsverfahren umfassend mit den Entwürfen und Vorschlägen für Gesetze und Richtlinien auseinander. Dadurch werden Wissenschaftler zu Sprechern im Diskurs mit Interessenverbänden, Rechtspraktikerinnen und Politikern, die sich während eines Gesetzgebungsverfahrens öffentlich zu Wort melden. Auch wenn sich Wissenschaft und Praxis damit in einem Diskursraum begegnen, so sind die methodischen Anforderungen an Beiträge zu diesem Diskurs doch nicht deckungsgleich. Für Beiträge mit wissenschaftlichem Anspruch können höhere Rationalitätsanforderungen gestellt werden als für jene mit rechtspraktischem Hintergrund. Die Beiträge zu laufenden Gesetzgebungsverfahren in juristischen Fachzeitschriften zeichnen jedoch ein verschwommenes Bild mit unklaren Grenzen zwischen den Rollen der Autoren und den methodischen Grundsätzen. Der Artikel betrachtet den gesetzgebungsbegleitenden Diskurs in juristischen Fachzeitschrif- ten aus der Perspektive der Diskurstheorie des Rechts und der juristischen Methodenlehre. Hierzu wird das empirische Beispiel der Reform des Europäischen Urheberrechts diskursanalytisch untersucht. Bei dieser politisch und gesellschaftlich umstrittenen Reform wurde von verschiedenen Akteuren, aus unterschiedlichen Perspektiven und mit divergierenden Interessen um Deutungen, Setzungen und Interpretationen der Reform und ihrer Folgen gerungen. Anhand dieses Falles zeigt der vorliegende Beitrag das Verhältnis wissenschaftlicher und praktischer Diskursbeiträge auf und diskutiert theoretisch untermauerte Anforderungen an Gesetzgebungsverfahren-begleitende Diskurse in der Rechtswissenschaft.