Weizenbaum Conference Proceedings
Dauerhafte URI für den Bereich
Einmal jährlich findet die Weizenbaum Conference in Berlin statt. Die Conference Proceedings stellen eine Sammlung der auf der jeweiligen Konferenz präsentierten Beiträge von nationalen und internationalen Wissenschaftler:innen dar.
Listen
Auflistung Weizenbaum Conference Proceedings nach Forschungsbereichen "Markt – Wettbewerb – Ungleichheit"
Gerade angezeigt 1 - 2 von 2
Treffer pro Seite
Sortieroptionen
- ItemAn Interdisciplinary Exploration of Data Culture and Vocational Training(Weizenbaum Institute, 2019) Etsiwah, Bennet; Hecht, Stefanie; Hilbig, RomyIn this interdisciplinary paper we discuss the intersection of organizational data culture and vocational education and training (VET). Building on a preliminary definition of data culture and an explorative analysis of data-related value propositions in the German VET market, we analyze how VET providers address organizational challenges in the wake of big data and digitization that affect many of today’s organizations, regardless of their traditional industry. We argue that if organizations want to implement a data culture, their employees have to receive appropriate trainings that convey relevant skills and competencies.
- ItemProceedings of the Weizenbaum Conference 2022: Practicing Sovereignty - Interventions for Open Digital Futures(Weizenbaum Institute, 2023) Herlo, Bianca; Irrgang, DanielWe advocate for the adoption of an integrated strategy aimed at achieving increased participation via effective digital public administration services. We argue that it is urgent to understand the integration of participatory approaches from the field of e-democracy in digitalized public administration, as trendsetting e-government implementations are already underway. We base our arguments on the observation that the approaches in e-democracy and e-government seem to be locked into extremes: In e-democracy, (experimental) platforms have failed to create a participative political culture. E- government, in turn, narrowly perceives citizens as customers. Additionally, efforts to increase digital sovereignty have mostly been educational ones that support citizens’ self-determined use of the digital but do not address sovereignty via the digital. As a result, digitalized public administration is not achieving its potential to create opportunities for participation during encounters with the administration. Hence, we argue for the adoption of a digitally aided sovereignty as a normative guide for an e-government transformation that strives to create opportunities for participation via the digital.