Innovating Democracy?

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Datum
2023
Herausgeber:innen
Autor:innen
Thiel, Thorsten
Berg, Sebastian
Rakowski, Niklas
Clute-Simon, Veza
Zeitschriftentitel
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Bandtitel
Verlag
Weizenbaum Institute
Zusammenfassung

The article concerns the case of #WirVsVirus, a civic hackathon organized in reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic and officially endorsed by Germany’s federal government. It aims to address the normative implications of this politically oriented technological format. Specifically, it asks how civic hackathons formulate and negotiate different political representation claims. Our analysis shows that the hackathon constituted a successful representative claim on behalf of civic tech initiatives vis-à-vis the administrative state. While this claim primarily concerned establishing a new format for efficient and subsidiary problem-solving in the wake of the crisis, the hackathon’s participatory promises have only been partially fulfilled. The hackathon was rather open to input from civil society, enabling it to attract substantial public interest. Nonetheless, its technological-organizational structure and competitive, solution-oriented procedures meant that decision-making power remained largely with the hackathon’s organizers.

Beschreibung
Schlagwörter
civic hackathon \ digital democracy \ representative turn \ democratic innovation \ #WirVsVirus
Verwandte Ressource
Verwandte Ressource
Zitierform
Thiel, T., Berg, S., Rakowski, N., & Clute-Simon, V. (2023). Innovating Democracy? Analyzing the #WirVsVirus Hackathon. Weizenbaum Journal of the Digital Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.34669/WI.WJDS/3.1.4