Open Research Data
Dauerhafte URI für die Sammlung
Listen
Auflistung Open Research Data nach Titel
Treffer pro Seite
Sortieroptionen
- ItemA categorized multimodal TikTok dataset(2023) Wedel, LionThis dataset encompasses 11242 entries of 5137 unique videos listed between the 31st of July and the 4th of August on the TikTok explore page (https://www.tiktok.com/explore). The page was accessed via a German IP address without being logged in. The data has been collected via the 4CAT Toolkit and the Zeeschuimer browser extension. The dataset contains the category and multimodal embeddings for each video. **Intended Purpose** The dataset is primarily intended for proof-of-concept studies, as a toy dataset to teach or to be used for seminar papers by students. Given the lack of a clear definition for each category by TikTok, the focus of such work might be to explore those definitions or to conduct work with a focus on methods. The multimodal embeddings allow for directly applying unsupervised and supervised machine learning techniques. **Contents** The dataset consists of four zipped .csv files: * – metadata.zip * – text_embeddings.zip * – audio_embeddings.zip * – video_embedding.zip **For further details, please consult the Data Report** (datenbericht_v2.pdf).
- ItemAppendix to “Your social ties, your personal public sphere, your responsibility”(2022) Gagrčin, Emilija### Appendix Vignette 1: Private Profile Vignette 2: Public Page
- ItemAttachment to the article “From Insult to Hate Speech: Mapping Offensive Language in German User Comments on Immigration”(2021) Paasch-Colberg, Sünje; Strippel, Christian; Trebbe, Joachim; Emmer, Martin### English Translation of German User Comments Attachment to the article “From Insult to Hate Speech: Mapping Offensive Language in German User Comments on Immigration” as part of the issue “Dark Participation in Online Communication: The World of the Wicked Web”, edited by Thorsten Quandt (University of Münster, Germany). #### Disclaimer This document contains both the German original and the English translation of all user comments quoted in the article. In order to ensure the anonymity of the authors, the original German quotations were modified. However, the parts that are relevant to the argument or example remain unchanged. Due to the nature of this document, the user comments presented here contain potentially offensive and upsetting terms, particularly racist and islamophobic. They are solely used as examples to illustrate the results of this research and do not reflect the views of the authors in any way.
- ItemBoulianne, Shelley (2021). Pathways to Environmental Activism in Four Countries. figshare. Dataset.(2022) Boulianne, ShelleyYouthEnviroActivism Sept2021.sav YouthEnviroActivism Sept2021.sps YouthEnviroActivism Sept2021.spv YouthEnviroActivism Sept2021.xls
- ItemData of the paper: Clickbait or conspiracy? How Twitter users address the epistemic uncertainty of a controversial preprint(Center for Open Science, 2022-06-22) Franzreb, Carlos; Schimmler, Sonja; Bauer, Mareike FenjaThis project contains sources related with the paper „Clickbait or conspiracy? How Twitter users address the epistemic uncertainty of a controversial preprint“:
Scripts
Scripts used to retrieve Tweets and to analyze/visualize them.
Quantitative Analysis: Data
+ tweets.json: All Tweets of the relevant users as nodes and their relationships (retweet, quote or reply) as edges.
+ users_clustered.json: Users as nodes and their follow-relationships as edges, clustered with the Leiden algorithm.
+ follower_network.json: JSON file corresponding to Figure 1.
+ interaction_network.json: JSON file corresponding to Figure 2
Qualitative Analysis: Data
Replies and quotes of the Tweets that are used in the qualitative analysis. - ItemDigitalization and organizational change during the Covid-19 crisis (Data and Codebook)(Weizenbaum Institute, 2024) Krzywdzinski, Martin; Butollo, Florian; Bovenschulte, Marc; Nerger, MichaelThe data set is based on a survey of companies conducted to investigate the extent to which the pandemic led to a strategic reorientation of digitalization measures in companies. The aim was to investigate whether digitalization measures were newly established and intensified, in which areas digitalization took place, and how the digitalization measures differed depending on the company’s level of digitalization, sector, and size. #### Methods The survey was realized as CATI by the market research company Hopp Marktforschung with the support of VDI/VDE Innovation+Technik GmbH (Marc Bovenschulte and Michael Nerger). The survey was conducted in Germany in two waves: in July and August 2021 and September and October 2022. The survey included 540 companies in the first wave and 605 companies in the second wave. 120 companies participated in both waves. The respondents belonged to the top and middle management of the companies (e.g. head of division). The survey was conducted in two waves in order to examine differences between companies' approaches at the beginning and later in the course of the pandemic and to check whether companies’ strategies solidified over time or whether they were just short-term reactions.
- ItemFAIREST Metrics and Assessment Data(zenodo, 2021-11-08) d’Aquin, Mathieu; Kirstein, Fabian; Schimmler, Sonja; Oliveira, Daniela; Urbanek, Sebastian
This data supplements the article “FAIREST: A Framework for Assessing Research Repositories”. In the article, we introduce the FAIREST principles, an extension of the well-known FAIR principles. Along these principles, we provide comprehensive metrics for assessing and selecting solutions for building digital repositories for research artefacts. The metrics are based on two pillars:
- an analysis of established features and functionalities, drawn from existing solutions,
- a literature review on general requirements for digital repositories for research artefacts and related systems.
- – ResearchGate
- – Academia.edu
- – Zenodo
- – arXiv
- – Bibsonomy
- – Figshare
- – CKAN
- – DSpace
- – Invenio
- – Dataverse
- – EPrints
We further describe an assessment of 11 widespread solutions, with the goal to provide an overview of the current landscape of research data repository solutions, identifying gaps and research challenges to be addressed. The solutions are:
Overview of the data
01 FAIREST Assessment Metrics and Solutions (All-in-one).xlsx
This Excel file includes both the assessment metrics and the results for the 11 solutions
02 FAIREST Assessment Metrics.csv
The assessment metrics as CSV
XX FAIREST Assessment XXX.csv
Assessment result for the respective solution
14 FAIREST Assessment Template.xlsx
A template to apply the metrics to an individual solution
Note: Fill in your assessment in column F and get the result at the bottom of the sheet
- ItemInterviews zu Forschungsdateninfrastrukturen und digitalen Praktiken offener Wissenschaft am Weizenbaum-Institut(Zenodo, 2022-02-04) Bauer, Mareike; Wünsche, HannesDie Forschungsgruppe „Digitalisierung der Wissenschaft“ begleitet am Weizenbaum-Institut den Aufbau eines Repositoriums für Publikationen und Forschungsdaten. Als Teil der Anforderungsanalyse wurden leitfadengestützte Interviews mit wissenschaftlichen Mitarbeiter*innen des Weizenbaum-Instituts durchgeführt. Ziel dieser war es, deren Erfahrung mit und Anforderungen an Forschungsdateninfrastrukturen zu identifizieren. Dieser Datensatz beinhaltet: \+ Studienreport \+ anonymisierte Interviewtranskripte \+ E-Mail Aufruf \+ Interviewleitfaden \+ Einwilligungserklärung.
- ItemOnline Supplementary Material for “How Right-Wing Populist Comments Affect Online Deliberation on News Media Facebook Pages“(2022) Thiele, Daniel; Turnšek, TjašaAppendix A: Literature Review Appendix B: Dictionaries for the Topic of Migration Appendix C: Codebook Appendix D: Automated Text Analysis Appendix E: Summary Statistics for Step 1 and Step 2 Appendix F: Right-wing Populism in Comments by Media Type Appendix G: Regression Tables for Step 1 References in Appendices A-G
- ItemReplication Data for: Message deletion on Telegram: Affected data types and implications for computational analysis(Center for Open Science, 2022-11-01) Bühling, KilianOnline supplement for: Buehling, K. (2023). Message deletion on Telegram: Affected data types and implications for computational analysis. Communication Methods and Measures. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2023.2183188. Please see the full paper for a description of data and methods.
- ItemReplication Data for: “Who reports witnessing and performing corrections on social media in the US, UK, Canada, and France?”(2024) Tang, Rongwei; Vraga, Emily; Bode, Leticia; Boulianne, ShelleyThese are the replication materials for the article "Who reports witnessing and performing corrections on social media in the US, UK, Canada, and France?" ### Files + HKSMR data.tab + HKSMR syntax.sps
- ItemSupplemental material for “Beware: Processing of Personal Data—Informed Consent Through Risk Communication”(2024) Seiling, Lukas; Gsenger, Rita; Mulugeta, Filmona; Henningsen, Marte; Mischau, Lena; Schirmbeck, MarieAppendix A: GDPR content analysis Appendix B: Expert interview questions Appendix C: Results of the systematic qualitative content analysis of expert interviews
- ItemSupplemental material for “Datafication Markers: Curation and User Network Effects on Mobilization and Polarization During Elections”(2023) Gagrčin, Emilija dc.contributor.author Ohme, Jakob dc.contributor.author Buttgereit, Lina dc.contributor.author Grünewald, FelixSupplemental material Table A1. Predicting campaign participation (cross-sectional) Table A2. Predicting campaign participation (auto-regressive) Table A3. Predicting vote choice certainty (cross-sectional) Table A4. Predicting vote choice certainty (auto-regressive) Table A5. Predicting turnout (cross-sectional) Table A6. Predicting turnout (auto-regressive) Table A7. Predicting attitude reinforcement (change variable) Table A8. Predicting affective polarization (cross-sectional) Table A8. Predicting affective polarization (cross-sectional)
- ItemSupplemental Material for “Notable enough? The questioning of women’s biographies on Wikipedia”(2024) Martini, FranziskaTable I. Sample size Table II. Reliability coefficients Table III. Total and relative numbers of biographies nominated for deletion by specific criteria for notability Figure I. Percentage of users and their level of justification by their position and the biography’s gender Figure II. Numbers of German-language Wikipedia biographies by tagged gender category and year of creation Figure III. Number of deletion nominations (N = 396) per logged-in users (N = 158) Figure V. Number of decisions (N = 362) per administrator (N = 35) Figure IV. Number of discussions (N = 461) logged-in users (N = 608) participated in
- ItemSupplemental Material for “Pandemic protesters on Telegram”(2023) Bühling, Kilian; Heft, Annett### Supplemental Material A.1 STM results A.2 Message characteristics A.3 Cluster prevalence of all actor types A.4 Reliability coefficients of manual content analysis A.5 Two-sample t-tests of topic distributions by entity type A.6 Pairwise two-sample t-tests of topic distributions by source type B.1 Codebook B.2 Codebook appendix
- ItemSupplemental Material for “Unravelling the Role of Data in Industrial Value Chains”(2025) Schneidemesser, Lea; Butollo, FlorianTable 1: Overview of interviewed companies and experts
- ItemSupplemental material: “Whose ideas are worth spreading? The representation of women and ethnic groups in TED talks”(2019)S1 Image recognition algorithm S2 Topic modeling S3 Regressions References
- ItemSupplementary data for “New methodologies for the digital age? How methods (re-)organize research using social media data”(2023) Fan, Yangliu; Lehmann, Sune; Blok, AndersData collection Data annotation and Word2Vec model training Table S1. Method list Table S2. Network topological quantities for the journal citation network
- ItemSupplementary data for “Why, with whom, and how to conduct interdisciplinary research? A review from a researcher’s perspective”(2024) Vladova, Gergana dc.contributor.author Haase, Jennifer dc.contributor.author Friesike, SaschaSupplementary data Table 1: Overview of the paper included in the data analysis. (Essential papers in bold) Table 2: Overview of the coding scheme
- ItemSupplementary Information for “Understanding scholar-trajectories across scientific periodicals”(2024) Fan, Yangliu; Lehmann, Sune; Blok, Anders1. Gender Assignment 2. Tables and Figures 3. The embedding model with five dimensions References
- «
- 1 (current)
- 2
- 3
- »