Weizenbaum Publikationen
Dauerhafte URI für den Bereich
Listen
Auflistung Weizenbaum Publikationen nach Forschungsbereichen "Verantwortung – Vertrauen – Governance"
Gerade angezeigt 1 - 9 von 9
Treffer pro Seite
Sortieroptionen
- ItemA Digital Euro for the EU: A Comment on Potential Impacts(Weizenbaum Institute, 2022) Florian, Martin; Pernice, Ingolf G.A.
- ItemAccess and benefit-sharing on digital sequence information: Policy paper in view of the COP15 UN Biodiversity Conference in Montreal in December 2022(Weizenbaum Institute, 2022) Klünker, Irma
- ItemData Governance Act Proposal(Weizenbaum Institute, 2021) Neuberger, Christoph; Friesike, Sascha; Krzywdzinski, Martin; Eiermann, Karin-Irene; Stocker, Volker; Schawe, Nadine; Efroni, Zohar; von Hagen, Prisca; Völzmann, Lisa; Müller, FerdinandThis Position Paper contains statements drafted by several Research Groups at the Weizenbaum Institute concerning the Data Governance Act (DGA) Proposal. Each statement is followed by a short explanation. The purpose of this Paper is to highlight a number of important aspects of the DGA Proposal and stimulate the debate around it with a special emphasis on the part that concerns regulation of data sharing services (Chapter III, DGA Proposal). The Paper touches upon a number of selected matters without the ambition to cover all the important issues the DGA legislation raises. The statements address the potential risks in creating a centralized architecture for data intermediaries, the problem of imposing a duty on data sharing services to offer data on a non-discriminatory basis, the role and expertise supervision authorities will need to assume and exercise and questions regarding the interface between the anticipated DGA and existing data protection law in the EU. The Paper includes a number of specific recommendations regarding the formulation of several DGA provisions, specifically in connection with its intersection points with the GDPR.
- ItemDie Regulierung Künstlicher Intelligenz - Neuer Rechtsrahmen für Algorithmische Entscheidungssysteme?(Weizenbaum Institute, 2020) Müller, Ferdinand; Schüßler, Martin; Kirchner, Elsa
- ItemEditorial: Volume 1, Issue 1(Weizenbaum Institute, 2021) Emmer, Martin; Krasnova, Hanna; Krzywdzinski, Martin; Metzger, Axel; Schimmler, Sonja; Ulbricht, Lena; Neuberger, ChristophThe Weizenbaum Journal of the Digital Society is an open access journal and could not function any other way, because we see digitalization as a process that changes traditional forms of communication and cooperation, which raises the questions of control of data, information and knowledge anew. We look forward to contributions about the conditions, forms and consequences of the digitalization of society and its sub-sectors such as politics, business, science, labor, the public, civil society, law and culture. The digitalization of society has many facets: the disruptive transformation of the world of work, radical changes in the economic and innovation systems, new forms of learning and the restructuring of educational systems, the transformation of public space through digital media and platforms, changes in the way democracies function, massive challenges for the legal system and the planning and design of technical infrastructures. In light of these developments, the question arises as to how social actors can shape the digital transformation while safeguarding the foundations for individual and societal self-determination.
- ItemFederated Blockchain Systems: A better trade-off between sustainability and decentralization?(Weizenbaum Institute, 2022) Florian, MartinBlockchain-based systems are enjoying unbroken popularity. Different economic and social actors are investigating their application for fostering decentralization and separation of power. Whether a blockchain-based system can live up to such goals is heavily determined by the choice of a consensus protocol – the rules by which participants agree on what gets added to the blockchain. Bitcoin’s consensus protocol is inherently decentralization-enabling, at a notoriously high ecological cost. So-called permissioned protocols, while incomparably more efficient, are dismissed as being closed-off and "centralized". Federated blockchain systems represent a middle ground between these two extremes and promise to offer openness and security without sacrificing ecological sustainability. As a rough approximation, their approach can be described as bootstrapping consensus from a web of trust. In this overview article, after a short review of the Bitcoin approach and possible alternatives to it, we introduce the ideas behind federated blockchain systems and discuss their impact on future blockchain systems.
- ItemRisiken Digitaler Systeme: Robotik, Lernfähigkeit und Vernetzung als aktuelle Herausforderungen für das Recht(Weizenbaum Institute, 2020) Zech, Herbert
- ItemStellungnahme zum Entwurf des Digitalisierungsgesetzes der Landesregierung Schleswig-Holstein, Drucksache 19/3267(Weizenbaum Institute, 2021) Müller, Ferdinand; Keiner, Alexandra; Schädlich, Finn; Völzmann, Lisa; Peter, Robert; Schrör, Simon; Efroni, Zohar; Schimmler, Sonja; von Hagen, Prisca
- ItemUmstrittene Expertise im Falle einer neuen Technologie. Eine explorative Untersuchung der Online-Konsultation zur Blockchain-Strategie der Bundesregierung(Weizenbaum Institute, 2020) Becker, Moritz; Henningsen, Sebastian; Pernice, Ingolf G.A.