Weizenbaum Publikationen
Dauerhafte URI für den Bereich
Listen
Auflistung Weizenbaum Publikationen nach Forschungsgruppen "Design, Diversität und neue Commons"
Gerade angezeigt 1 - 2 von 2
Treffer pro Seite
Sortieroptionen
- ItemEditorial: Practicing Sovereignty – Interventions for Open Digital Futures(Weizenbaum Institute, 2023) Irrgang, Daniel; Herlo, BiancaThis issue is dedicated to the Weizenbaum Conference 2022, titled ‘Practicing Sovereignty: Interventions for Open Digital Futures.’ The Weizenbaum Institute’s annual gathering brought together researchers, networks, and collaborators to focus on the theme of ‘digital sovereignty.’ This term, hotly debated and used with varying connotations in fields such as research, activism, law, and policy-making, refers to competencies, duties, and rights in digital societies. The contributions compiled in this issue are based on papers presented at the 2022 conference. They explore notions of digital sovereignty in tension with topics such as AI deepfakes, algorithmic governmentality, ethics and datafication in the context of machine learning, and community-driven open-access publishing in academia.
- ItemProceedings of the Weizenbaum Conference 2022: Practicing Sovereignty - Interventions for Open Digital Futures(Weizenbaum Institute, 2023) Herlo, Bianca; Irrgang, DanielWe advocate for the adoption of an integrated strategy aimed at achieving increased participation via effective digital public administration services. We argue that it is urgent to understand the integration of participatory approaches from the field of e-democracy in digitalized public administration, as trendsetting e-government implementations are already underway. We base our arguments on the observation that the approaches in e-democracy and e-government seem to be locked into extremes: In e-democracy, (experimental) platforms have failed to create a participative political culture. E- government, in turn, narrowly perceives citizens as customers. Additionally, efforts to increase digital sovereignty have mostly been educational ones that support citizens’ self-determined use of the digital but do not address sovereignty via the digital. As a result, digitalized public administration is not achieving its potential to create opportunities for participation during encounters with the administration. Hence, we argue for the adoption of a digitally aided sovereignty as a normative guide for an e-government transformation that strives to create opportunities for participation via the digital.