Open Research Data
Dauerhafte URI für den Bereich
Listen
Auflistung Open Research Data nach Autor:in "Schimmler, Sonja"
Treffer pro Seite
Sortieroptionen
- ItemData of the paper: Clickbait or conspiracy? How Twitter users address the epistemic uncertainty of a controversial preprint(Center for Open Science, 2022-06-22) Franzreb, Carlos; Schimmler, Sonja; Bauer, Mareike FenjaThis project contains sources related with the paper „Clickbait or conspiracy? How Twitter users address the epistemic uncertainty of a controversial preprint“:
Scripts
Scripts used to retrieve Tweets and to analyze/visualize them.
Quantitative Analysis: Data
+ tweets.json: All Tweets of the relevant users as nodes and their relationships (retweet, quote or reply) as edges.
+ users_clustered.json: Users as nodes and their follow-relationships as edges, clustered with the Leiden algorithm.
+ follower_network.json: JSON file corresponding to Figure 1.
+ interaction_network.json: JSON file corresponding to Figure 2
Qualitative Analysis: Data
Replies and quotes of the Tweets that are used in the qualitative analysis. - ItemFAIREST Metrics and Assessment Data(zenodo, 2021-11-08) d’Aquin, Mathieu; Kirstein, Fabian; Schimmler, Sonja; Oliveira, Daniela; Urbanek, Sebastian
This data supplements the article “FAIREST: A Framework for Assessing Research Repositories”. In the article, we introduce the FAIREST principles, an extension of the well-known FAIR principles. Along these principles, we provide comprehensive metrics for assessing and selecting solutions for building digital repositories for research artefacts. The metrics are based on two pillars:
- an analysis of established features and functionalities, drawn from existing solutions,
- a literature review on general requirements for digital repositories for research artefacts and related systems.
- – ResearchGate
- – Academia.edu
- – Zenodo
- – arXiv
- – Bibsonomy
- – Figshare
- – CKAN
- – DSpace
- – Invenio
- – Dataverse
- – EPrints
We further describe an assessment of 11 widespread solutions, with the goal to provide an overview of the current landscape of research data repository solutions, identifying gaps and research challenges to be addressed. The solutions are:
Overview of the data
01 FAIREST Assessment Metrics and Solutions (All-in-one).xlsx
This Excel file includes both the assessment metrics and the results for the 11 solutions
02 FAIREST Assessment Metrics.csv
The assessment metrics as CSV
XX FAIREST Assessment XXX.csv
Assessment result for the respective solution
14 FAIREST Assessment Template.xlsx
A template to apply the metrics to an individual solution
Note: Fill in your assessment in column F and get the result at the bottom of the sheet
- ItemUmfrage zu Forschungsdatenmanagement am Weizenbaum-Institut(Zenodo, 2021) Toth, Roland; Vuorimäki, Julian; Schimmler, Sonja; Krzywdzinski, Martin; Friesike, Sascha; Neuberger, Christoph; Oellers, ClaudiaThis dataset contains responses to a survey on open data and open access amongst members of the Weizenbaum Institute for the Networked Society which ran from 30 August to 21 September 2021. The survey elicited 39 valid responses out of 181 potential respondents working at the institute. Contributors (according to CRediT): Roland Toth Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Validation. Julian Vuorimäki Roles: Conceptualization, Investigation, Project Administration, Validation. Sonja Schimmler Roles: Conceptualization, Supervision. Martin Krzywdzinski Roles: Conceptualization, Supervision. Sascha Friesike Roles: Conceptualization, Supervision. Christoph Neuberger Roles: Conceptualization, Supervision. Claudia Oellers Roles: Conceptualization, Project Administration, Supervision.