Browsing by Author "Reinhardt, Susanne"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5

Mobilization and support structures in radical right party networks. Digital political communication ecologies in the 2019 European parliament elections
(2022) Heft, Annett; Reinhardt, Susanne; Pfetsch, Barbara
The 2019 European Parliament elections seemingly fostered concerted political action among radical right parties (RRPs) to fortify their positions and mobilize publics on a pan-European scale. Digital platforms provide central infrastructure for networks among political actors and user interactions on the ground. Our study, therefore, investigates the intra- and transnational networking on Twitter established by RRPs’ strategic communication and user interactions. To understand how distinct political and media-related opportunity structures align with different intensities, types, and meanings of digital connections, we investigate the salience, actor types, and geographical scopes as well as the functions of digital connections within and across Twitter networks in Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Sweden during the EP election campaigns. Our results indicate the influence of parties’ structural power position on networked communication: The ecologies around RRPs in government reflect their integration in national discourses and competition. The networks of RRPs in opposition display a self-referential campaign ecology for the promotion and distribution of candidates, content, and positions. Transnationality in these networks is structured by EU-level collaboration and driven by civil society and political entrepreneurs, who appear keener to mobilize across borders.
Supplementary Material for “Mobilization and Support Structures in Radical Right Party Networks”
(2022) Heft, Annett; Reinhardt, Susanne; Pfetsch, Barbara
Supplementary Online Appendix Mobilization and Support Structures in Radical Right Party Networks. Digital Political Communication Ecologies in the 2019 European Parliament Elections Table A1: Data overview on parties’ activity and references included in study, May 2019 Table A2: Data overview on user engagements with parties and references included in study, May 2019 Table A3: Valence of parties’ digital connections (top-down), in percent Table A4: Valence of user interactions with parties, in percent Codebook A – Actors Codebook B – Functions of References
Supplementary Material for “Varieties of antigenderism: the politicization of gender issues across three European populist radical right parties”
(2023) Reinhardt, Susanne; Heft, Annett; Pavan, Elena
### Supplement I: Table S1 Overview of all posts by page holders (Facebook and Twitter) Table S2 Reliability Scores Table S3 Frequency Table: General Topic across Parties (in %) in Baseline Corpus, coded as main topic Table S4 Frequency Table: Posts containing gender topics across parties (in %) in Baseline Corpus, not coded as main topic Table S5 Frequency Table: Position toward Gender Topic across parties (in %) Table S6 Node Centrality ### Supplement II: Cross-Country Dictionary Construction Keyword List Topic Network Construction Community Detection Illustrative Examples of Posts for the Most Frequent Gender Topics
Toward a Transnational Information Ecology on the Right? Hyperlink Networking among Right-Wing Digital News Sites in Europe and the United States
(2021) Heft, Annett; Knüpfer, Curd; Reinhardt, Susanne; Mayerhöffer, Eva
The recent rise of a more transnationally networked political right across Europe and the United States has been accompanied by an emerging alternative digital news infrastructure through which information circulates and shared epistemologies are established. This paper examines the extent to which digital news sites on the right are interconnected within and across countries. It further explores which additional sites serve as transnationally shared reference points of such news ecology on a transnational scale. To do so, we investigate hyperlink networks between alternative right-wing online news sites (RNS) in six western democracies (Austria, Germany, United States, United Kingdom, Denmark, Sweden). Our analysis draws on hyperlink data harvested from 65 RNS for three months in 2018. The results show that RNS do establish interlinked alternative right-wing news ecologies, as they connect to likeminded RNS within and across borders. Furthermore, we see substantial variation across countries, where RNS from countries with less established alternative right-wing news infrastructure are more likely to link transnationally to RNS. The United States represents an outlier in that it features the largest and domestically most integrated network of RNS, while U.S. sites function as hubs for transnational connections from European RNS. Apart from connections between RNS, we find that legacy news media are crucial transnationally shared reference points. We conclude that rather than presenting an insulated, alternative sphere, the emerging digital news ecology on the right seeks to link up to the broader information environment across borders.
Varieties of antigenderism: the politicization of gender issues across three European populist radical right parties
(2023) Reinhardt, Susanne; Heft, Annett; Pavan, Elena
This research contributes to the study of populist radical right parties’ (PRRPs) role in gendered democratic backsliding by analyzing their articulation and symbolic representation of gender issues. We compare the politicization of gender issues across three European PRRPs, examining how context-speciﬁc gendered opportunity structures – the level of contestation of gender issues in their country, the resonance of antigenderism among their electorate, and their issue repertoire and historical trajectory – shape the extent and ways in which the German AfD, the Italian Lega and the Sweden Democrats politicize gender issues. We conduct a quantitative content analysis of PRRPs’ framing of gender issues and construct topic networks based on the parties’ Facebook and Twitter posts during the European Parliament election campaign 2019. We analyze the salience of gender issues, the broader topical context in which they are embedded, the speciﬁc gender issues addressed, and the parties’ positions on these issues. Our results show how context-speciﬁc gendered opportunities shape PRRPs’ national gender discourses: A low level of contestation, evidenced by a high public recognition and legal protection of gender and sexual equality, seems to foster a femonationalist framing, while antigenderist discourse is less pronounced in such a context. Instead, a higher level of contestation, expressed in a lower public recognition and legal protection of gender and sexual equality, seems to foster antigenderist discourse. A transnational femonationalist framing, shared by all analyzed parties, relates to a common nativist ideological core.